and go...
theory: women become attached to their sexual partners quicker than men because women are penetrated. ie: the man becomes a part of them.
weigh in.
michelle.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
"there is no beautifier of complexion or form or behaviour like the wish to scatter joy and not pain around us" -ralph waldo emerson
About Me
who?
- a textured self
- forget the superego i'm the super it
- four thousand feet and still falling
- half-doubting thomas
- i have a crush on you
- i masturbate and you should too
- invincible summer
- julia's radio
- lost socks need love too
- love and other indoor sports
- on the corner
- pseudo psyence
- spoonman
- the acoustic prophet
- the radio dial
- waving at satellites
what?
uh huh...
really?
hmmm...wow!
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(245)
-
▼
June
(33)
- there's no better porn than free porn
- and the talking leads to touching
- odd
- mystery man
- darling...
- more written shit
- no, i actually LOVE food
- hash browns, eggs, toast and friendly strangers...
- in praise of road construction
- i like food
- best rock show souvenir of all time!
- stuck in traffic
- assault group
- and are you thinking of me when you fuck her?
- bumrape
- if leftist artists can write plays than so can big...
- "i felt like i was in a different world" remarked ...
- covert posting
- for shits and giggles
- to all those in possession of a penis
- it's all very vaginal lately
- he skull-fucked me with his tongue.
- what the shit kids? what the shit?
- stream of conjunction
- welcome to june 6th
- point of fact:
- argh! if only i WERE a pirate
- apparently i am drinking again
- so what if this is emo!
- for the spank bank
- beep beep beep beep beep
- "tilt your mast forward..."
- debate...NOW
-
▼
June
(33)
8 comments:
Bullshit.
Women become attached to their sexual partners because they're fucking crazy broads. Then they call you in the middle of the night and yell at you cuz you didn't show up at the Black Dog cuz you felt sick after Ultimate Frisbee.
Hold on......what was I talking about? Oh ya, I call bullshit. I think it depends on the person, not the genetalia.
I don't know where you pulled this statement, Michelle, but what total and utter bullshit.
I remember taking a psychology of sex class a few years back and in not a single one of the hundreds of research articles did any of them allude to women becoming more quickly attrached to men because they get penetrated.
Where on earth did you hear/see someone say/write this?
This is retarded. In fact, not even "The Karate Kid" soundtrack is as retarded. Just because a man has a meatsicle (read: meat popsicle) and it becomes a "part" of a woman's mighty cavern, does not make me want them more. Don't get me wrong, I love my hot rod, but for more reasons than penetration alone.
Protein too?
I can't believe you dissed the Karate Kid. I bet you wouldn't dis him to his FACE. KAPOW!
I think this statement might make sense from a semiotic rather than literal viewpoint. Of course michelle is right that often during sex, the receptive party does end up with "some" of the penetrative party. Now, there is no reason why this physical fact should imply that the receptive party should become emotionally attached to the penetrator - but our society has developed some language to indicate that this is so. After all, it's commonly accepted (although scientifically debunked) that women developed through evolution a desire for committment and monogamy so as to ensure that they and their children were provided for. The man "provides" the sperm through penetraction, and the woman is expected to hang on to the man so he can "provide" food, etc.
Just to be clear, I personally believe that to be nonsense. I'm fairly sure that anthropologists and archaeologists have pretty much decided that women through out the ages have been capable of providing for themselves. Probably Kate can give more details about that.
I call bullshit as well. I am not sure that men suffer any less when they go through a legit breakup than women do, regardless of who was inside who.
Hahaha, oh Jay. So blunt. I love it.
michelle? how 'bout you? what's the impetous behind this debatable statement?
Post a Comment